I'd like you to think about and answer the following:
1. When are emotions pathological?
Something that is pathological is related to disease. Emotions can be considered pathological (or like a disease) when they meet two criteria. (1) They must be extreme, excessive, or markedly abnormal and (2) they must cause some kind of disruption/problem to oneself or society. Patrick (1994) cites Cleckley's definition of psychopaths: Indicators of social deviance (i.e. irresponsibility, impulsive antisocial behavior, failure to learn from experience, bizarre behavior under the influence, absence of long term goals), general poverty of affection, defective insight, absence of nervousness, lack of remorse or shame, disinclination toward suicide, egocentricity and incapacity to love, pathological lying, superficial charm, absence of close relationships, and impersonal sexuality.
2. When are they disruptive to social and personal functions?
Emotions can be disruptive to social and personal functions when they hinder the relations between people. For example anger can be a hindrance to a relationship between a husband and a wife.
3. Some people claim that particular emotions are in and of themselves dysfunctional (e.g. anger). What do you think?
I am tempted to agree but also believe that there is sometimes a time and a place for all emotions. When we are faced with injustices in the world, our emotions can help us determine the proper actions to take. Often our emotions lead us down the wrong path however and so I can see how people might believe that some emotions are dysfunctional.